Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Wednesday 20Jan 2010


NEW DELHI: Is it time for India to bring its intelligence apparatus under legislative oversight? As national security advisor M K Narayanan makes

Twitter Facebook Share


Email Print Save Comment


way for a new incumbent and, perhaps a new structure, the issue of accountability of intelligence agencies has been put on the table.

On Tuesday, Vice-President Hamid Ansari gave a definite thumbs up to a system of oversight to govern the intelligence community in India. Addressing senior intelligence officers for the R N Kao memorial lecture at the R&AW headquarters, Ansari said while both accountability and oversight were anathema to intelligence communities, these needed to be introduced into the Indian structure.

Quoting an intelligence expert, he said, "How shall a democracy ensure its secret intelligence apparatus becomes neither a vehicle for conspiracy or a suppressor of the traditional liberties of democratic self-government?"

He said the current scheme where intelligence agencies are kept outside the ambit of parliamentary scrutiny is no longer tenable. "The traditional practice of oversight by the concerned minister and prime minister and general accountability to Parliament... is now considered amorphous and does not meet the requirements of good governance in an open society."

Intelligence agencies have historically chaffed at suggestions of being exposed to parliamentary scrutiny for a whole range of reasons -- from fear of political interference to loss of secrecy that they need.

In his address to the intelligence brass, Ansari reflected the concerns but did not buy into those. He said the arrangement where intelligence agencies are accountable only to the executive raises concerns about the nature and scope of such supervision as well as the potential for misuse.

He said that other democracies who also wrestled with the dilemma have opted for oversight. "United States reached the conclusion that oversight of the intelligence community is essential because of critical importance of ensuring the nation's security as well as checking the potential for misuse of power."

Citing the different forms of parliamentary intelligence oversight, he argued, "Given these models of calibrated openness to ensure oversight and accountability, there is no reason why a democratic system like ours should not have a standing committee of Parliament on intelligence."

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Ford Fusion


When Ford introduced the Ford Fusion back in 2005, the Blue Oval's midsize sedan was a pleasant surprise. Ford delivered vastly improved quality while also offering impressive driving dynamics, room for five adults and a choice of four- and six-cylinder engines. The Fusion put Ford back into play in the battle for midsize sedan supremacy, and in some ways the agile sedan shined brighter than the Camry and Accord. The Fusion also won respect from Consumer Reports for its high quality, and JD Powers named the Fusion an APEAL winner. For all that is right about the Fusion, though, it has consistently ranked fourth or fifth in the sales battle, losing big to the Altima, Accord, and Camry.

Ford put a lot into the first generation Fusion, and for 2010 the Dearborn, MI-based automaker is taking more big strides. The Fusion has a fresh look, more powertrain combinations, and hybrid offering that can achieve 41 mpg in the city. Ford also introduced the new 2010 Fusion Sport with a 3.5L V6 engine producing 263 hp and 249 lb-ft of torque. We've been waiting patiently for Ford to offer its 3.5L engine in the Fusion, so we happily took the keys to a well-equipped Fusion Sport recently to test it for ourselves. Follow the jump to see how the new Fusion Sport fared during its stay in the Autoblog Garage.

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Ford Australia saves jobs and inline-6 with big investment


"No, thanks," says Ford of Australia to the Duratec V6. Instead, Ford of Oz will invest $21 million to upgrade its homegrown inline six-cylinder and keep the invading powerplant out. The ongoing commitment to its own engine saves jobs at Ford's Geelong plant, as well as keeps local Australian suppliers healthy. It doesn't make any sense for gaskets, castings, bearings and other various parts to come from some other continent, so it's a piece of good news for the economy in Victoria. The engine will be freshened to meet Euro IV emissions standards and will keep thundering away down under with exemplary second-order vibration characteristics. The Falcon, Falcon Ute, and Territory will continue to be homegrown products with homegrown hearts, that we still badly want here in he States. C'mon Ford, if Pontiac can do it, you can, too. Thanks for the tip, everyone!